Yes. Section 2707(a)1, the War Powers Resolution, is repealed. That is the law that requires the President after 60 days to bring the troops home if we have not acted affirmatively to support the presence of the troops there. In other words, by doing nothing, the President has to call everybody home, which gives a false expectation to our adversaries, if they just wait us out. It has never been tested in court. No President ever, of either party, has recognized it as constitutional. It is unworkable. I am just trying to clean up the law so we have left a requirement of consultation and reporting timely and comprehensive and we always have that appropriations authority. You will remember the Boland amendments which cut off funds for the Contras. We passed one every year over my objection, but we did. Just one example of Congress cutting off funds for belligerencies we did not agree with.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the repeal of Section 2707(a)1 of the War Powers Resolution.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I think our politics has suffered. I hope not a mortal blow, but certainly a serious blow. The name calling, the negativity, the throwing of mud, the institution of the White House, the presidency, and Congress itself. People are looking…
It is a privilege to speak in honor of the life and the achievements of His Holiness Pope John Paul II. It is hard to imagine any other person who holds so much worldwide respect regardless of religious faith. The estimated 4 million…
while there may be some provisions in the Menendez substitute that are worthy of discussion during conference, I still rise in opposition to his amendment. Our review of the Commission's report was performed with a seriousness and a…
you know, in all contentious discussions, there are a set of imaginary barricades, and people get on one side or on the other. On one side of the barricades, the hypothetical barricades, are people's main concern of prison welfare. They…





