I rise in strong opposition to the rule because it waives all points of order against unauthorized appropriations contained in this bill. I object particularly to the funding for four unauthorized construction projects totaling over $25 million. The projects are courthouses in Albany, GA, Steubenville, OH, Corpus Christi, TX, and Providence, RI. To the many taxpayers who are listening to the debate, discussion of the House rules may seem unimportant. In fact, what is at stake here is whether we allow a few powerful Members of the House to circumvent rules and spend millions of tax dollars on what I would call pork-barrel projects. Now, by pork barrel I mean that these spending projects have had no authorizations, no hearings, no determination of the need for these projects. That is a failure to, simply, follow the basic procedures of the House in regard to spending. To taxpayers who are outraged that their tax money is wasted on pork-barrel projects I say, Watch this vote very carefully. A vote for this rule is a vote for breaking the rules of the House and in this instance allowing $24 million to be spent on what I would call pork.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a rule that waives points of order against unauthorized appropriations in a spending bill.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
Mr. Speaker I am pleased today to rise to seek passage of Senate 1227, legislation which amends title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, known as ERISA, to permit investment advisors registered with State securities…
The Supreme Court in Town & Country made it very clear that an employer, in dealing with an applicant, has to treat that applicant, even though the applicant is a member of a labor union and even though he may be a paid employee of a labor…
I rise to enthusiastically support H.R. 3160. The bill includes key small business health insurance reform that was in H.R. 995, reported by the Economic Opportunities Committee: It gives small employers the right to form groups for the…
we do not want this construed to mean that there can be just generalized opinions. So I think it is something that ought to remain in the report language. And I repeat, I think if what the gentleman has is centered only upon housing, then…





