there is a letter from Palm Springs, California. Sonny Bono was such a dear friend to all of us, and of course he was a co-sponsor of our original legislation. We are now joined by his wife, who is going to do a terrific job in representing the area that was represented by her late husband. But Pam Mann of Palm Springs, California says, ``I recently heard that you are sponsoring a bill to not have tax penalty on married couples as it now exists. Our beloved Congressman is no longer with us but he was a personal friend, and I also worked on all of his campaigns. I remember discussing things with him. We talked about the government having things backwards sometimes and rewarding people that are not working and penalizing the working people and somehow sending the wrong message.'' She supports our legislation. She says she is praying for this legislation. She thinks it is important that we do something and do the right thing; that is, eliminate the marriage tax penalty. If you think about it, 21 million married working couples pay an average $1,400 more just because they are married. Frankly, not only is it not right, but it is wrong that our tax code actually punishes marriage. $1,400. That is a year's tuition at Joliet Junior College. That is three months' daycare at a local child care center. That is why I am pleased this legislation is gaining such strong support. It deserves bipartisan support.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the marriage tax penalty and supporting legislation to eliminate it.
Share
More from Gerald Weller
I would note that most House Republicans and the administration have stated that we all support an extension of unemployment benefits. In fact, the letter we just placed in the Record says the administration would sign into law a 13-week…
Mr. Speaker, I stand here in support of extending unemployment benefits, and I have sponsored legislation to accomplish that goal. All Republican members of the Ways and Means Committee supported extending benefits when our committee…
several speakers have suggested that there is plenty of funds in Federal unemployment accounts to support these benefits. Today, those trust funds include $35 billion, and the Congressional Budget Office suggests this legislation will…
it's interesting as we debate this legislation that some have criticized targeted help for those who we would like to provide extended unemployment benefits for, and of course, the bill before us actually targets the final 13 weeks of a…





