I, too, have also been receiving letters and E-mails as well of those who have been suffering from the marriage penalty. Like our friend, the gentleman from California (Mr. Royce), I have been written by a number of tax preparers who have shared examples. One gentleman, a Robert Eckert of Jacksonville, Florida, in a letter that he shared with us, he says, ``As a seasonal tax preparer and enrolled agent, I find the marriage penalty can be very significant; 12 percent of after-tax income or 33 percent increase in tax liability for many couples. This marriage penalty hits all ages and all incomes.'' He has several examples here; I will mention a couple of them. One is a retired couple and the other is a low income couple. The retired on Social Security couple, he says this couple got married midyear, each with about $20,000 in company pension income and $12,000 in Social Security payments. As singles, they would pay no tax on the Social Security income; but as married, $16,000 of combined Social Security payments become taxable for a penalty of $2,400. Think about that. A married, retired couple paying $2,400 just because they are married.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the marriage penalty on couples during a speech on tax reform.
Share
More from Gerald Weller
as I had noted earlier, this Congress, the Democrat majority in the House today, has the lowest level of popularity, lowest level approval in recorded history, 16 percent. Why? Because of actions like today. This legislation that is before…
this motion to recommit supports extension of unemployment benefits for long-term unemployed, those who have exhausted their unemployment benefits. And this motion to recommit makes three simple changes to the legislation before us. It…
Well, I would first point out to my friend from Michigan that I represent the State of Illinois. And under the legislation which we offered in committee, my State of Illinois would receive extended unemployment benefits. I would also state…
And of course these tariffs would be eliminated immediately upon implementation of the U.S-Colombia Trade Agreement. I yield back the time, but it is so important to point out, Illinois is a big winner, manufacturers as well as farmers.





