I rise in support of the position taken by the chairman of the Subcommittee on Social Security, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw), in opposition to an amendment offered by my longtime friend and respected seatmate of 10 years, who I disagree with on his amendment, in a respectful way. Let me ask, I think, three important questions. One, why are we having this vote, which is essentially putting the cart before the horse? Why are we singling out Mexico, our next-door neighbor, number 2 trading partner, and friend? And, three, why is there an effort to essentially vent our frustration over illegal immigration on a potential agreement with our friend, Mexico? That is why I think it is important for us to be very careful on this amendment, because we have Social Security totalization agreements with 7 out of 10 of our biggest trading partners. Mexico is our second largest trading partner. We have thousands of American workers working in Mexico who right now are in a situation where they are forced to pay two sets of Social Security taxes. A totalization agreement would be of great benefit to American workers working in Mexico, as well as their American employers who may be employing them. In fact, they say they could save up to $140 million in additional taxes that workers and American companies would suffer unless we have a totalization agreement.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing an amendment related to Social Security totalization agreements with Mexico.
Share
More from Gerald Weller
Mr. Speaker, I stand here in support of extending unemployment benefits, and I have sponsored legislation to accomplish that goal. All Republican members of the Ways and Means Committee supported extending benefits when our committee…
Mr. Speaker, as Yogi Berra once said, this is like deja vu all over again. Yesterday after an 8-week delay, the House considered and failed to pass the legislation once again before us today. I continue to support providing extended…
I want to thank my friend, Jerry Costello, for yielding and join in honoring the life and service of someone who was a friend to many in this Chamber. My friend and predecessor, George Sangmeister, served in this body for 6 years…
the legislation before us, as was so eloquently described by the Republican leader of the House, makes some radical changes. For 27 years, Republicans and Democrats have had in place a work rule requirement for federally funded…





