I am proud to say tonight we have an opportunity to provide prescription drug coverage under Medicare for our senior citizens. Tonight we are seeing an example of two different kinds of debate. Some people want to offer partisan rhetoric for political purposes. Others want to offer policy, policy which gives a solution to the challenge we have. The bottom line is we want to provide prescription drug coverage for our seniors. It was quoted earlier this year, one of the advisers to the Democratic leadership said, ``One of the biggest worries that our policy people had was that they would actually write a good bill.'' We have a good bill before us. This is a bill that increases funding for Medicare by $350 billion, provides prescription drug coverage under Medicare, lowers the cost of prescription drugs now, guarantees all senior citizens prescription drug coverage, improves Medicare with more choices and more savings, and strengthens Medicare for the future. The question is: What does that mean for the average senior citizen? The bottom line is under the plan that the gentlewoman from Connecticut (Mrs. Johnson) is managing before the House of Representatives, we have an opportunity to save for senior citizens real money. The overall out-of-pocket drug costs would fall by as much as 70 percent according to the Department of Human Services with the plan we have before us today.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the opportunity to provide prescription drug coverage under Medicare for senior citizens.
Share
More from Gerald Weller
I would note the previous speaker referred to 6 percent as being ruthless. That's actually the formula in the majority Democrats' bill. So it was interesting that he criticized his own bill. I would also note to my good friend from…
Trade is important to my home State of Illinois. One in five manufacturing jobs depends on trade; 40 percent of agricultural products are exported from Illinois; and I would note, of the 17,000 Illinois companies that are dependent on…
You've been waiting 8 weeks because of election-year politics. This legislation could have been brought to the floor immediately, we could have had a bipartisan bill that had become law, but no. Our friends in the majority played…
I want to state that I share the Speaker's admiration for Mr. Rangel and Mr. McDermott. I consider Mr. Rangel very intelligent, and I enjoy working with Mr. McDermott as well, but I do disagree with the distinguished Speaker on a point…





