Mr. Speaker, as I just begin my remarks in opposition to the Rangel substitute and in support of an effort to save Social Security and eliminate the marriage tax penalty, I might just use the Democrats, my friends on the other side of the aisle's own rhetoric. If you think about it, everything they have been claiming, they have admitted they have been raiding is the Social Security trust fund for 28 years. In fact, I believe a Democratic President, President Johnson, I think started that process in 1969. Now, thanks to a Republican Congress, for the first time since 1969, we have a $1.6 trillion budget surplus, money that we can use to save Social Security and eliminate the marriage tax penalty. The gentleman from New York (Mr. Rangel) in his substitute basically says 'Let's save Social Security and let's give a tax cut to Wall Street, but let's forget about Main Street.' It is interesting that the Rangel substitute chooses Wall Street and stiffs Main Street. Republicans, we want to save Social Security, and we also want to eliminate the marriage tax penalty, and our legislation will help 28 million married couples.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the Rangel substitute regarding Social Security and the marriage tax penalty.
Share
More from Gerald Weller
this motion to recommit supports extension of unemployment benefits for long-term unemployed, those who have exhausted their unemployment benefits. And this motion to recommit makes three simple changes to the legislation before us. It…
you know, trade and exports are important in States like Illinois, and particularly the district that I represent. In Illinois, 17,000 businesses depend on exports for their survival. Forty percent of the corn soybeans and pork and beef…
I rise to urge the Speaker of this House to bring forward for a vote in this House the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement. We know Colombia not only has the most long-standing democracy in all of Latin America, but is our most trusted…
it's interesting as we debate this legislation that some have criticized targeted help for those who we would like to provide extended unemployment benefits for, and of course, the bill before us actually targets the final 13 weeks of a…





