Mr. Speaker, briefly responding to the dialogue of my colleague and member of the Committee on Ways and Means, I would note again that he is absolutely right. Today's debate is about eliminating the marriage tax penalty, simplifying the Tax Code for low- and moderate-income working married couplings. This debate is also about whether or not we give hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of welfare recipients the opportunity to have a job, to have a chance. That is what this debate is about.
Gerald Weller: “Mr. Speaker, briefly responding to the dialogue of my colleague and member of the Committee on Ways and Means, I would…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the debate on eliminating the marriage tax penalty and its implications for welfare recipients.
Share
More from Gerald Weller
That is what is frustrating, and one of the reasons I know I came to Congress in 1994 and one of the causes we in the House Republican majority have been working towards, is finding ways to help working families have some extra spending…
Mr. Speaker, before recognizing our next distinguished speaker here, I would note that the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pascrell) consistently voted no on eliminating the marriage tax penalty and what he considers a cost to Uncle Sam, to…
But I would just like to comment on one point that you made. You said Illinois is headquarters to Caterpillar, and people think of the yellow construction equipment. There is more to it than you think, and that's why this trade agreement…
You've been waiting 8 weeks because of election-year politics. This legislation could have been brought to the floor immediately, we could have had a bipartisan bill that had become law, but no. Our friends in the majority played…





