Having been to Uganda and having seen the success of this program, the characterization on the floor is not correct. Secretary of State Powell has made it clear the United States approach involves all three--abstinence, fidelity, and condoms. And in the country of Uganda, it has been successful. Why in the world are we establishing a 33 percent requirement when it comes to the abstinence programs? This afternoon we had tea with the First Lady of Uganda, and we had a conversation with her and asked, wouldn't you want to have the flexibility to apply these programs to the communities and villages and situations in the most effective way to fight this disease? She said, of course we would. This House bill, which is now so sacred that we cannot change one word, has put in 33 percent--not in the interest of global health but in the interest of an American political agenda. That is unfortunate.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. global health policy and its impact on Uganda during a House debate.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
“Birthright citizenship is the law of the land, which the Supreme Court just upheld in June.
I want to recognize the incredible partnership that made this possible: Stone Community Development Corporation, Lurie Children’s, Thresholds, and Chicago Neighborhood Initiatives.
“The highest court in the land shouldn’t have the lowest ethical standards. Public trust in the Supreme Court remains near historic lows, and every story of a luxury gift or questionable failure to recuse contributes to it. The American…
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…





