Can I ask--at least make a point here for the Senator from Pennsylvania? If he would be kind enough to read section 1532 of the penalties, under offenses: First offense, section (b), second offense, section (c). Note that it says: Upon a finding by the court the respondent in an action commenced under subsection (a) has knowingly violated a provision of this chapter, the court shall notify . . . And it goes on to say medical license at stake, fine at stake. Now, if you will turn back to read section (a) you will find 1531, section (a) includes viability of fetus. So if a doctor has misrepresented--for example, if there is medical evidence the fetus was viable and the doctor went ahead and performed an abortion, arguing, ``Well, it wasn't viable,'' and in so doing has misrepresented the medical facts, he can have his license revoked and face the penalty. That is what it says, section (a). It doesn't go down to subsection (1) and (2); it says subsection (a), which includes viability of the fetus. What we are driving at is this, I would say to the Senator from Pennsylvania. Under this language I don't think I am going to get endorsed by any medical group that is going to stand up and say what a great amendment, Senator Durbin, because it puts an extraordinary burden on doctors who want to be involved in these abortions. But I think that burden is merited when we are dealing with these particular circumstances.
On the recordMarch 11, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a specific amendment related to abortion and medical penalties.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Aug 17, 2026
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…
Aug 19, 2026
We always work closely with the leaders in local government regardless of their party affiliation.
Aug 26, 2026
Yesterday’s Supreme Court order is a temporary procedural win for President Trump as he attempts to pursue these lawless goals—but it doesn’t change the reality that the Constitution empowers states to run our elections, and the rule of…





