the debate we just heard is probably a replay of many arguments over the Voting Rights Act of 1965: It is a matter of States' rights. It isn't the Congress's responsibility. This is too big a job. But we decided in the 1960s that the accident of birth or color would not deny you your right to vote in America. Today, by turning down this amendment, we would say the accident of the voting machine that you face wherever you happen to be registered can turn away your right to vote, can deny you this basic constitutional franchise. One out of three voters will not have the protection of this law because the compromise legislation doesn't provide for notification in punchcard systems.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of voting rights and the implications of a proposed amendment.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
It is families who will suffer, especially the sickest Americans, like those with mental health and substance use disorders, cancer, and diabetes, who most urgently need the health care Medicaid provides.
What I witnessed today illustrated President Trump and Stephen Miller’s ruthless agenda: they will go so far with their cruel immigration operation to target terrified children, forcing them to articulate their fears in front of a judge…
Today’s news is devastating for the 2,500 skilled union workers impacted by the closure of the Tyson plant in Joslin, especially at a time when American families are struggling with the rising cost of living.
I’m glad these borrowers, after years and years of waiting, will finally get the relief they’re entitled to.





