Further questioning the Senator from Iowa, I don't believe in polygraphs. I never recommend them. Most State courts do not recognize the results, I don't think they are accurate. But it was a pressure tactic by the FBI to try to get Senators on the Intelligence Committee to say publicly whether they would submit to a polygraph. It is an indication of what they can do when they want to. The question is, Will they do it? Would Attorney General Ashcroft's Department of Justice do that to the highest ranking officials in President Bush's White House? The answer is obvious. So I ask, does that not make the case for a special prosecutor?
Dick Durbin: “Further questioning the Senator from Iowa, I don't believe in polygraphs. I never recommend them. Most State courts do…”
On the recordOctober 1, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the use of polygraphs and the need for a special prosecutor during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Aug 29, 2026
Courtrooms handling upwards of 150 respondents in a judge’s morning docket raise serious concerns about whether individuals are receiving a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
Aug 24, 2026
The lawmakers also emphasized that the Trump Administration’s definition of medical frailty far exceeds what is outlined in the law itself and creates additional onerous barriers for both patients and states.
Aug 21, 2026
The American Red Cross declared a national blood supply crisis in the U.S. last month for just the second time ever, which has impacted patients’ ability to be treated for illnesses or undergo surgery.





