Members of the Senate are coming to the floor today from both sides of the aisle to acknowledge a moment in our history: the passing of Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia. Senator Byrd was the longest serving Senator in the history of the United States of America; a man who cast more than 18,000 votes; a man who served as majority leader, as chairman of the Appropriations Committee, as President pro tempore. He was, in fact, the Senate. He embodied the Senate in his life. It was his life. Each of us, before we can become a Senator, takes a walk down this aisle and goes over to the side here where the Vice President of the United States swears us in. You put your hand on a Bible and you take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. For Robert C. Byrd, it was a commitment, a life commitment to a document, the Constitution of the United States. He used to carry one in his pocket every day of his life. That is the kind of commitment most people will not make because they think: Well, maybe I will change my mind. For Robert C. Byrd, there was no changing his mind. He was committed to that Constitution. For him, it was the North Star, it was the guiding light, it was the document that created this Nation, and he had sworn on his Bible to uphold and defend it, and he meant it. That is why he was so extraordinary.…
On the recordJune 28, 2010
Editor's note · Context
Senator Durbin honors the legacy and commitment of the late Senator Robert C. Byrd.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Aug 14, 2026
It was a grave mistake for the Senate to approve Todd Blanche as the next Attorney General.
Aug 15, 2026
Our state’s top-notch rail system keeps our economy moving while allowing Illinoisans to travel from Chicago to Carbondale.
Aug 29, 2026
Senator Duckworth and I helped to secure $18.3 million in federal funding for the Southern Illinois Multimodal Station to better connect families, students, and small businesses to local and national destinations.
Aug 24, 2026
The lawmakers also emphasized that the Trump Administration’s definition of medical frailty far exceeds what is outlined in the law itself and creates additional onerous barriers for both patients and states.





