Well, I want to ask the Senator: We are considering on the floor S. 96, the so-called Y2K bill, which is designed to protect businesses. And good, compelling arguments can be made about protecting businesses. But doesn't this vote suggest that the majority party feels that we should not be discussing help for working families, those in the lower income categories who are falling behind even as they go to work every single day trying to raise their families? That is how I read that vote. It is loud and clear.
Dick Durbin: “Well, I want to ask the Senator: We are considering on the floor S. 96, the so-called Y2K bill, which is designed to…”
On the recordApril 28, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Y2K bill on working families during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Oct 9, 2026
We ask that you immediately provide all committee records that you have withheld, commit to fully complying with Senate Rules XXVI and XXVII going forward, and apologize to Mr. Smith on behalf of the Committee.
Oct 13, 2026
The lack of community involvement and speed with which this project has moved forward raises questions about the role of private interests.
Oct 13, 2026
To leave here without this being a law finalized to protect these young people … is painful, really painful. I don’t want them to feel like I’m abandoning them.
Oct 14, 2026
These changes threaten to undermine the work of the FBI and pose a grave risk to the Bureau’s integrity.





