Is it not true that the same Supreme Court that is going to consider our bill ruled that you had to include, in the protection for the woman involved, if her health was at risk, she could go forward with the procedure? Is my memory correct that this Court, within the last year or two, made that decision?
Dick Durbin: “Is it not true that the same Supreme Court that is going to consider our bill ruled that you had to include, in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Supreme Court's ruling on health exceptions in relation to partial-birth abortion legislation.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
To leave here without this being a law finalized to protect these young people … is painful, really painful. I don’t want them to feel like I’m abandoning them.
For decades, America has stood as the bastion of freedom against tyranny, and American presidents have embodied our nation’s resistance to tyrants. Putin is a tyrant.
These authorities require you to apply economic pressure on Russia and the chief enablers of its war, in particular China, and thereby enhance your negotiating position to bring a swift end to this ruinous conflict.
We ask that you immediately provide all committee records that you have withheld, commit to fully complying with Senate Rules XXVI and XXVII going forward, and apologize to Mr. Smith on behalf of the Committee.





