Then if I might ask, the next section (c)--I am trying to get to the point of let's use an example of the State of Mississippi which has just decided on a cap of $500,000 on noneconomic losses effective January 1 of this year. Now, the underlying bill, S. 11, says that the cap on noneconomic losses will be $250,000. So in that instance, is it the position of the Senator that this bill would not preempt Mississippi law; that Mississippi's number would apply even though it is larger than S. 11?
Dick Durbin: “Then if I might ask, the next section (c)--I am trying to get to the point of let's use an example of the State of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed cap on noneconomic losses in relation to state law.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
We ask that you immediately provide all committee records that you have withheld, commit to fully complying with Senate Rules XXVI and XXVII going forward, and apologize to Mr. Smith on behalf of the Committee.
The lowering of the FBI's hiring standards "threaten[s] to undermine the work of the FBI and pose a grave risk to the Bureau's integrity.
Transferring immigrants to Guantánamo Bay is simply unlawful, and worse yet, inhumane.
These authorities require you to apply economic pressure on Russia and the chief enablers of its war, in particular China, and thereby enhance your negotiating position to bring a swift end to this ruinous conflict.





