What the bill before us would suggest is if you or a member of your family or one of your children is a victim of medical malpractice, there would be a strict limitation in this bill of how much you could recover in court for what is known as noneconomic losses, pain and suffering. That strict limitation would be $250,000. To many people, $250,000 seems to be a very substantial sum of money, and it is until it is put in the perspective of the injuries we are discussing. Yesterday, in the course of the debate, I told the story of a 6-year-old boy in my home State of Illinois who went to a downstate clinic with a high fever. Unfortunately, he did not receive appropriate medical care and a jury decided he had been a victim of medical negligence.
Dick Durbin: “What the bill before us would suggest is if you or a member of your family or one of your children is a victim of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of S. 11, a bill on medical malpractice reform.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Students need to be careful. You can’t go wrong starting with City Colleges and community colleges in your community… I beg my young students in Illinois to start there, and counselors to do their job and discourage kids from getting…
Our state’s top-notch rail system keeps our economy moving while allowing Illinoisans to travel from Chicago to Carbondale.
The Trump administration has not provided transparency into the use of federal funds for the East Wing project, and they have limited congressional oversight, meaningful public input, and adherence to established federal processes.
We want to be clear: Democrats and Republicans did not work together to appropriate funds for AHRQ as a gentle suggestion for the Department to follow at their discretion or leisure.





