I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Booker), the Senator from North Dakota (Ms. Heitkamp), and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) are necessarily absent. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lankford). Are there any other Senators in the Chamber desiring to vote? The result was announced--yeas 91, nays 0, as follows: [Rollcall Vote No. 89 Leg.] YEAS--91 Alexander Ayotte Baldwin Barrasso Bennet Blumenthal Blunt Boozman Boxer Brown Burr Cantwell Capito Cardin Carper Casey Cassidy Cochran Collins Coons Corker Cornyn Cotton Crapo Cruz Daines Donnelly Durbin Enzi Ernst Feinstein Fischer Franken Gardner Gillibrand Graham Grassley Hatch Heinrich Heller Hirono Inhofe Isakson Kaine King Klobuchar Lankford Leahy Lee Manchin Markey McCain McCaskill McConnell Menendez Merkley Mikulski Moran Murphy Murray Nelson Paul Perdue Peters Portman Reed Reid Risch Roberts Rounds Rubio Sasse Schatz Schumer Scott Sessions Shaheen Shelby Stabenow Sullivan Tester Thune Tillis Toomey Udall Vitter Warner Warren Whitehouse Wicker Wyden NOT VOTING--9 Booker Coats Flake Heitkamp Hoeven Johnson Kirk Murkowski Sanders The amendment (No. 4206) was agreed to. (At the request of Mr. Reid, the following statement was ordered to be printed in the Record.) vote explanation <bullet> Mr. BOOKER. Mr. President, today the Senate voted on amendment No. 4206 to S. 2943, the National Defense Authorization Act, NDAA, for fiscal year 2017.…
Dick Durbin: “I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Booker), the Senator from North Dakota (Ms. Heitkamp), and the Senator…”
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Together, you’ve created a space where residents can access pediatric care, behavioral health services, housing and employment support, and much more.
Five years at $200 million amounts to $1 billion… it represents 48 hours in the war in Iran.
What I witnessed today illustrated President Trump and Stephen Miller’s ruthless agenda: they will go so far with their cruel immigration operation to target terrified children, forcing them to articulate their fears in front of a judge…
The highest court in the land shouldn’t have the lowest ethical standards. Public trust in the Supreme Court remains near historic lows, and every story of a luxury gift or questionable failure to recuse contributes to it. The American…





