today we were visited on Capitol Hill by Alan Greenspan. Alan Greenspan is the head of the Federal Reserve and is considered the economics guru who comes to Washington periodically, to Capitol Hill, and gives us advice. Sometimes that advice is very wise and sagacious, and sometimes I think it is totally political--the same Alan Greenspan who helped President Clinton with the task of reducing the deficit, the right thing to do. President Clinton came up with a proposal which in fact reduced the deficit, a deficit which through previous administrations of President Ronald Reagan and President George Bush finally came to an end at the end of the Clinton administration. For the first time in modern memory, we were generating surpluses in the Federal Treasury. All of that red ink finally ended. We moved into the black. Mr. Greenspan was the inspiration for this initially, saying to the Clinton administration, get serious and get real about the deficit. We were anxious to listen to Mr. Greenspan in following years about what his advice might be. Along came the Bush administration 4 years ago proposing dramatic tax cuts. The argument for the White House was, if you have a surplus, more money in the Treasury than you need, for goodness sakes, give it back to the people who paid it. That was the argument for the tax cut. Many of us warned that sometimes the economy turns around, and things happen you don't anticipate.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of Alan Greenspan's advice on fiscal policy during a speech on Capitol Hill.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
In the coming weeks, we remain committed to supporting our union members during this transition and working with Tyson to ensure that they have access to resources that support their return to work.
Small businesses need more support right now, and that’s exactly what the EBC is offering.
Our state’s top-notch rail system keeps our economy moving while allowing Illinoisans to travel from Chicago to Carbondale.
The Trump administration has not provided transparency into the use of federal funds for the East Wing project, and they have limited congressional oversight, meaningful public input, and adherence to established federal processes.





