Let us defer to the professionals, the obstetricians and gynecologists who have written to us and said, Please don't pass S. 3, the Santorum amendment. There are moments in time when we have to make critical medical decisions, and in those moments we have to do what is best for the woman involved here. Don't foreclose an opportunity. Don't tell us we cannot do it. Don't make it be prohibited under law. That, I think, is what this debate is all about. I will tell you that this amendment which I have offered does not have universal acceptance either on the pro-choice or the pro-life side. Even this morning a pro-choice group notified me that people voting for the Durbin amendment are not going to be viewed in a popular and favorable light. I consider myself pro-choice in my approach to this decision. I know now that some pro-choice groups disagree with us because this amendment is very strict and very specific. It says when it comes to postviability abortions and late-term abortions, we are laying down very strict limitations and guidelines as to when you can be eligible for this.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of the Santorum amendment on medical decisions regarding late-term abortions.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
A farmer in Nebraska expects to pay for his wife and himself $32,000 this year for health insurance premiums.
What I witnessed today illustrated President Trump and Stephen Miller’s ruthless agenda: they will go so far with their cruel immigration operation to target terrified children, forcing them to articulate their fears in front of a judge…
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…
We want to be clear: Democrats and Republicans did not work together to appropriate funds for AHRQ as a gentle suggestion for the Department to follow at their discretion or leisure.





