Aren't we also imposing some obligations on school districts across America to have more teachers certified in certain subjects so that they will teach math and science, for example, computer skills, because they also have the skills and training to do it? Aren't we saying to school districts in the next few years, we want you to have more and more certified teachers, qualified teachers, standing in the classrooms? I hear that when I get back to Chicago in the State of Illinois. They say: That is a good goal. We want to meet that goal. But understand that takes an investment in teacher education and training; that takes resources for the school district to attract these good teachers and keep them. Aren't we, in the Bush bill, Leave No Child Behind, creating a goal of more certified teachers in the classroom and then in the Bush budget not putting in the money to achieve that goal?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Leave No Child Behind legislation on teacher certification and funding.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
The lawmakers also emphasized that the Trump Administration’s definition of medical frailty far exceeds what is outlined in the law itself and creates additional onerous barriers for both patients and states.
The American Red Cross declared a national blood supply crisis in the U.S. last month for just the second time ever, which has impacted patients’ ability to be treated for illnesses or undergo surgery.
Students need to be careful. You can’t go wrong starting with City Colleges and community colleges in your community… I beg my young students in Illinois to start there, and counselors to do their job and discourage kids from getting…
Senate Democrats continue to support the full repeal of Republicans’ disastrous Medicaid cuts and stand united in calling on the Trump Administration to withdraw this harmful rule.





