On the recordFebruary 9, 2006
I am glad we have finally come to this portion of the argument because it reinforces a lot of things that have been said on this Senate floor over the last several days. It really comes down to a very basic question, the question as to whether this bill has been carefully crafted, whether it contains enough money in the trust fund to compensate the hundreds of thousands of asbestos victims who will have to count on it. I have raised this issue repeatedly as to the $140 billion figure. There are reliable estimates of the actual cost over a 50-year period of time that almost double the amount of this trust fund, some even higher. Senator Kent Conrad on our side of the aisle is well respected as the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee. His background as the head of taxes in his State of North Dakota, his own personal education and experience give him extraordinary credibility when it comes to issues of cost and issues involving accounting. He has made a convincing case to our caucus and to those who are listening on both sides of the aisle that the $140 billion that is part of this trust fund is not nearly adequate to the task. Of course, if it isn't, what choices do we have? Senator Specter suggested on the floor the other day that if $140 billion wasn't enough to pay the victims, then we will pay the victims less. Today when I asked him a similar question, he said there are other options.…
Source
govinfo.gov




