I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record. There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: S. 750 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Elections Now Act''. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I--FAIR ELECTIONS FINANCING OF SENATE ELECTION CAMPAIGNS Subtitle A--Fair Elections Financing Program Sec. 101. Findings and declarations. Sec. 102. Eligibility requirements and benefits of Fair Elections financing of Senate election campaigns. ``TITLE V--FAIR ELECTIONS FINANCING OF SENATE ELECTION CAMPAIGNS ``Subtitle A--General Provisions ``Sec. 501. Definitions. ``Sec. 502. Fair Elections Fund. ``Subtitle B--Eligibility and Certification ``Sec. 511. Eligibility. ``Sec. 512. Qualifying contribution requirement. ``Sec. 513. Contribution and expenditure requirements. ``Sec. 514. Debate requirement. ``Sec. 515. Certification. ``Subtitle C--Benefits ``Sec. 521. Benefits for participating candidates. ``Sec. 522. Allocations from the Fund. ``Sec. 523. Matching payments for qualified small dollar contributions. ``Sec. 524. Political advertising vouchers. ``Subtitle D--Administrative Provisions ``Sec. 531. Fair Elections Oversight Board. ``Sec.…
On the recordApril 6, 2011
Share
More from Dick Durbin
Aug 29, 2026
Through these hearings, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is intentionally overcrowding dockets with little notice to immigrants in an effort to manufacture significant numbers of removal…
Aug 17, 2026
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…
Aug 29, 2026
Courtrooms handling upwards of 150 respondents in a judge’s morning docket raise serious concerns about whether individuals are receiving a meaningful opportunity to be heard.





