I certainly concur with his conclusion. We serve on the Judiciary Committee together. We both heard the testimony of Elena Kagan as well as had a chance to ask her questions and listen to her responses to other Senators. She is an extraordinarily talented woman who could bring to the Supreme Court a wealth of experience. I couldn't agree with the Senator from Minnesota more that the fact that she has not worn a judicial robe before does not in any way disqualify her. She has an exemplary resume. I thank the Senator for noting the most important element here is that many of the arguments that have been used against judicial nominees in the past have evaporated on the other side of the aisle because the Roberts Court is in the midst of an activist phase-- something they promised would never happen, and it has happened, but it has happened to the satisfaction of one part of the political spectrum, where there are fewer critics as a result.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Durbin discusses the qualifications of Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
It’s great to be here at the EBC to celebrate the good, impactful work that is at the core of this center’s mission.
I have threatened some of these for-profit schools as a way of getting them to drop the loans that they were enforcing on these students, because I know what happens in the end.
Senate Democrats continue to support the full repeal of Republicans’ disastrous Medicaid cuts and stand united in calling on the Trump Administration to withdraw this harmful rule.
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…





