If I might continue through the Chair to ask the Senator from Nevada a question, on the issue that I think is before America today--whether we should escalate the number of troops into this war in Iraq--we had offered to the Republican side a choice between two Republican amendments: Senator Warner's amendment, which said the President's policy is wrong, and Senator McCain's amendment, which says the policy is advisable and should be followed. Even given the option of two Republican amendments, the Republican minority, yesterday, voted to deny any opportunity for the Senate to debate two Republican amendments?
Dick Durbin: “If I might continue through the Chair to ask the Senator from Nevada a question, on the issue that I think is before…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's response to proposed amendments regarding troop escalation in Iraq.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
These changes threaten to undermine the work of the FBI and pose a grave risk to the Bureau’s integrity.
The lack of community involvement and speed with which this project has moved forward raises questions about the role of private interests.
These authorities require you to apply economic pressure on Russia and the chief enablers of its war, in particular China, and thereby enhance your negotiating position to bring a swift end to this ruinous conflict.
To leave here without this being a law finalized to protect these young people … is painful, really painful. I don’t want them to feel like I’m abandoning them.





