I think it was the right vote to deal with our deficit and the problems we face. The total amount being spent there was $1.108 trillion. The amount of that bill that was earmarked for specific projects was less than 1 percent of that--$8 billion out of $1.108 trillion. That is less than 1 percent. And that was within the total amount we were limited to spend. It wasn't as if we added it on. We were given a total amount, and less than 1 percent of it was earmarked as to where it was going, with complete transparency and disclosure. Again, it was $8 billion. It troubles me when I hear Members come to the floor... saying we put an end to porkbarrel spending, and now we are dealing with our deficit. Well, $8 billion is a lot of money to anybody, but in the context of the debt we face as a nation and the need to address it, it is not significant. I think about the fact that yesterday most of us voted--81 of us--for a tax bill, and included in that tax bill were tax cuts for people who were pretty well off in America; $20 billion a year in tax cuts for the richest estates in America to escape Federal taxation--$20 billion.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Durbin discusses the significance of earmarks in the context of the federal deficit and tax cuts.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
The American Red Cross declared a national blood supply crisis in the U.S. last month for just the second time ever, which has impacted patients’ ability to be treated for illnesses or undergo surgery.
Yesterday’s Supreme Court order is a temporary procedural win for President Trump as he attempts to pursue these lawless goals—but it doesn’t change the reality that the Constitution empowers states to run our elections, and the rule of…
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…





