That is the total cost of this bill, if I am not mistaken. The difference, of course, the $20.3 billion, or $21 billion, for reconstruction. I concede we have to add to our deficit and borrow from the trust fund to support the troops. I will do that and go home and defend it. But when it comes to the $20 billion for reconstruction, this administration is asking 15 or 16 times more than they were asking 6 months ago. So let's be very clear to the American people. The reconstruction of Iraq, with a total cost of $60 billion, is just getting started with this bill. We are in for the long haul, if we pass this bill as written. Senator Byrd has an appropriate amendment he offered in committee. Let's separate it. Let's vote for the support of troops. Let's make that clear and get it done. But then, to go on beyond that and the reconstruction, let's address that in the specific terms it deserves.
Dick Durbin: “That is the total cost of this bill, if I am not mistaken. The difference, of course, the $20.3 billion, or $21 billion…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the costs and implications of a bill related to Iraq reconstruction funding.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
We always work closely with the leaders in local government regardless of their party affiliation.
Simply put, no president has the authority to unilaterally demolish and remodel the country’s White House in such a significant manner without congressional approval.
I want to recognize the incredible partnership that made this possible: Stone Community Development Corporation, Lurie Children’s, Thresholds, and Chicago Neighborhood Initiatives.
Nominations hearings, like this one today, are an essential part of the Senate’s role in providing advice and consent on presidential nominees. This constitutional duty is a critical check on the Executive Branch. And it has never been…





