This morning in the Senate Chamber, we had a motion to bring up a bill, which President Bush is asking for, on foreign operations, part of which is to deal with infectious disease surveillance, $175 million, and $255 million to feed these Afghan refugees who are literally dying on our TV screens every night, and we had a party-line vote: The Democrats saying go along with the President, move the bill, give him the money and the resources, do what is important for America, and the Republicans, with the exception of one Senator, Mr. Stevens who voted ``present,'' all voted not to go to the President's bill on foreign operations appropriations. The reason they have decided to hold back the money for this emergency aid to feed, clothe, and shelter the Afghan refugees is because the number of judges coming out of the Judiciary Committee is not coming out fast enough; is that the argument?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a party-line vote on foreign operations funding related to Afghan refugees.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
We always work closely with the leaders in local government regardless of their party affiliation.
Together, you’ve created a space where residents can access pediatric care, behavioral health services, housing and employment support, and much more.
Today’s news is devastating for the 2,500 skilled union workers impacted by the closure of the Tyson plant in Joslin, especially at a time when American families are struggling with the rising cost of living.
The Trump administration has not provided transparency into the use of federal funds for the East Wing project, and they have limited congressional oversight, meaningful public input, and adherence to established federal processes.





