This is an amendment with which I tried to construct a deal, facing what I consider to be an extremely serious situation. We now have a body of law in America relative to products which are sold for human consumption, and there are different laws and standards for different products. The ordinary American walking into a pharmacy or drugstore or health food store or nutrition store may not know that, depending on which product you take off the shelf, there is a different standard of care, a different legal requirement. I would like to spend a moment to discuss the differences. If you were to go into your local pharmacy and have a prescription filled--which many of us have--this is what you know. This prescription drug has been tested for three things before it was sold to you. First, that it is safe, that you can consume it without injuring yourself; second, that it is efficacious, meaning it will do what it is supposed to do; and, third, it has been packaged and manufactured in a fashion so when they say it is 200 milligrams, it is in fact 200 milligrams.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for consistent safety standards for products sold for human consumption.
Share
More from Dick Durbin
I still have five or six months at this job and I’m planning on running through the tape.
Yesterday’s Supreme Court order is a temporary procedural win for President Trump as he attempts to pursue these lawless goals—but it doesn’t change the reality that the Constitution empowers states to run our elections, and the rule of…
The President is dead set on attacking Americans’ right to vote and undermining our democracy by making baseless claims about ‘rigged’ elections, demanding unreasonable voter registration requirements, restricting mail-in voting, and…
“Birthright citizenship is the law of the land, which the Supreme Court just upheld in June.





