of critical importance here is an understanding shared by the gentleman from Virginia [Mr. Boucher] and me that the economic burdens of complying with the competitive checklist fall on the party requesting the interconnection. However, to the extent the rural telephone company economically benefits from the interconnection, the States should offset the costs imposed by the party requesting interconnection. Furthermore, we want to make clear that while H.R. 1555 provides that the user of the interconnection pay the cost of interconnection, the user in this context is the corporate entity requesting interconnection with a local exchange company. It would be a perversion of the intent if the cost of complying with the competitive checklist would require the incumbent rural telephone company to increase its basic local telephone rates to fund the competitor's service offering.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic implications of interconnection costs in telecommunications legislation.
Share
More from Dennis Hastert
Ladies and gentlemen, for us on the Republican side of the aisle, it is a sad day today. We have lost Helen Sewell. Helen served in the Republican cloakroom for over 70 years. She was a person who was always happy, always met any special…
I, first of all, learned of this last Friday, when we were about to leave Congress for you know, the break to -- to go out and campaign.
This is one of the leaks that come out to try to, you know, intimidate people. And we're just not going to be intimidated on it.
When you talk about the page issue and what's happened in the Congress, I'm deeply sorry that this has happened. And the bottom line is that we're taking responsibility because ultimately, as someone has said in Washington before, the buck…





