On the recordJune 26, 2017
None of that is proof of anything, but it certainly raises a lot of suspicion.
Source
transcripts.cnn.comEditor's note · Context
Axelrod discusses the implications of Roger Stone's past communications and their relevance to the investigation.
Share
More from David Axelrod
Dec 3, 2024
Yeah. I don't see the president-elect as a sentimental person. I don't think he's going to hang on here if he believes that Hegseth has become a liability to him.
Feb 2, 2025
There's a cost to U.S. credibility and there's a cost to Trump's credibility by bluffing like this and then pulling back.
Jul 3, 2026
An elderly man, probably homeless, was sprawled unconscious on the museum's front stone steps in the midst of a heat emergency. I called 911, and the operator said, ‘Well, is he ASKING for help?’ When I said no, she said, ‘Well, I'm not…
Mar 3, 2025
I mean, he's president of the United States. He was elected. They should be there.
Other voices in this conversation
