this does not require the President, as I understand it, to support any tax cut. He could have full funding for Medicare. He could add money to Medicare over and above what the law allows, add more money to the environment, add more money to education. I guess the bottom line is it just requires the numbers to add up by the year 2002. Is that correct?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary implications and funding priorities during a floor speech.
Share
More from Danny Davis
my constituent, Debra, has this to say about Medicaid, and I agree. She says: It is absolutely essential. She adopted two medically fragile children from foster care. Both have Medicaid as their primary and only health insurance. They both…
Predominantly Black Institutions and other Minority Serving Institutions open the doors of higher education to low-income students and students of color whom historically have had more limited educational opportunities.
I reject extremist efforts to promote hate and harm based on who one loves or how they self-identify.
as we begin 2026 with Trump and Republican policies squeezing workers, spiking costs, tanking job security, the Republican leadership advances this bill to divert money intended for poor children to dangerous anti-abortion centers. When my…





