But the central issue here is, should the Government in its procurement operate on a ``one size fits all'' standard, or are we going to allow the buyer, are we going to allow that agent then who is trying to get the best price they can for the Government, the flexibility to do the right thing, the flexibility to make those determinations, and, once again, the sole criteria is not changed one iota under the current law, and this amendment does not affect that at all. All the rhetoric notwithstanding it says decisions are going to be made in the back room. The decisions on sole source do not change one bit under this. Mr. Chairman, I urge opposition to this amendment.
Danny Davis: “But the central issue here is, should the Government in its procurement operate on a ``one size fits all'' standard, or…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to government procurement standards.
Share
More from Danny Davis
Press releases claiming dramatic improvements in SSA customer service, particularly on the 800-number, conflict with reports from AARP and our constituents,
Press releases claiming dramatic improvements in SSA customer service, particularly on the 800-number, conflict with reports from AARP and our constituents,
The 7th District has long felt the impact of aging infrastructure, and our residents deserve a rail system that is safe, reliable, and built to last.
Restoring and strengthening the Health Profession Opportunity Grant program will connect a new generation of workers with career pathways to in-demand health care jobs while addressing barriers to employment that too often prevent the full…





