again, the frustration. Everything, every amendment that comes up, is an emergency, it is a crisis. It is something that this bill is somehow going to take away the flexibility of this body or the regulators to address. I just do not think that is the case. But I would just note that the same people have been arguing for all of these other exemptions, the Clean Air Act; wastewater treatment; aviation airport security; licensing, construction, and operation of nuclear reactors; disposal of nuclear waste and toxic substances; operation of nuclear reactors; health of individuals with disabilities; child labor; minimum wages; OSHA; protection of children; help for people with disabilities; and then this. It is the same arguments and attempts to weaken this bill. Many of these items have valid points, but I think they can all be addressed within the flexibility of this act, given this body can still go ahead with unfunded mandates after they are costed out and the regulators reach what those costs are before they act.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about amendments to a bill related to regulatory flexibility.
Share
More from Danny Davis
“Press releases claiming dramatic improvements in SSA customer service, particularly on the 800-number, conflict with reports from AARP and our constituents,”
Restoring and strengthening the Health Profession Opportunity Grant program will connect a new generation of workers with career pathways to in-demand health care jobs while addressing barriers to employment that too often prevent the full…
I unconditionally and absolutely reject President Trump's and Elon Musk's work to steal American's Social Security benefits, a scheme that hurts middle-class and working-class families and seniors to pay for tax handouts to billionaires.
I reject extremist efforts to promote hate and harm based on who one loves or how they self-identify.





