when I first heard about a balanced budget constitutional amendment, I thought it was a foolish idea. But events in recent weeks have convinced me that I misjudged it. In fact, it is worse than that. It is a bad idea that will make things worse rather than better and will undermine our public reputation. In the past few weeks, the voters have repeatedly told me that they wanted straight talk and real options. They are tired of blue smoke and mirrors. That is why they nominated a gubernatorial candidate in my State who is calling for tax increases. And I believe that is why they nominated me. I believe it is important to reduce the deficit and I have worked hard to achieve that goal. I take partial credit for the progress we have made in recent years. And we have made real progress. But I do not see a need to worship at the alter of the balanced budget. Nor do I see a need to tinker with the Constitution. Balancing the budget isn't rocket science. It involves a series of simple, but tough choices. If you want to balance the budget you have to both raise taxes and cut spending. We could do that right now if balancing the budget was our sole priority. There is no need for a constitutional amendment that would buy us years of breathing space as we awaited ratification. And while making the tough decisions I describe could balance the budget, the balanced budget amendment would not.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the balanced budget constitutional amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Daniel Rostenkowski
Mr. Speaker, the Committee on Ways and Means brings before the House today H.R. 4278, a bill simplifying and streamlining the payment of Social Security payroll taxes on domestic workers. This bill will reform the so-called nanny tax to…
I rise in support of H.R. 3759, which provides vital supplemental funding to assist victims of the recent California earthquake. It also provides additional needed funding for victims of last year's Midwest floods and critical assistance…
Tomorrow in Marrakesh, Morocco, the United States and 124 other nations will sign the Uruguay round trade agreements. This historic trade pact was concluded last December after 7 long years of multilateral negotiations under the GATT. I…
I want to join Speaker Foley, my colleague, the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Michel], in actually commending our colleague, Mr. Moakley, on the fabulous dissertation. Actually, Tip O'Neill was a jovial host and a great individual. As a…





