I have to say that the Bateman substitute suffers from the same defects as the ones in the bill. It uses the same outdated population and needs data to apportion SRF money to finance construction of wastewater facilities. The result is a formula that bears no resemblance to the clean water needs we face today. Thus, it will not help us prepare for the environmental challenges we will be facing in the near future. The phase-in period is also problemmatical. It simply means that we have to wait another 4 years to get 20 percent of the adjustment we need to reflect current and future needs. We have waited a long time to update the wastewater SRF formula.
On the recordMay 12, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the shortcomings of a wastewater funding bill during House floor debate.
Share
More from Dan Lipinski
Sep 8, 2020
Lipinski also questioned the passenger railroad's decision to temporarily reduce service on most long-distance routes from daily to three times a week. He argued that such cuts were "misguided" and would weaken the rail service.
Jun 30, 2020
As chair of the Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials Subcommittee and coauthor of H.R. 2, I am proud that we have the robust road, rail, and transit bill that our country needs to start fixing our transportation system and put…
Mar 3, 2020
Thank you, Congressman Lipinski and the Subcommittee again for the opportunity to testify.





