I spent most of my career as an energy particle physicist and accelerator designer, designing and building complex technical systems. Nothing is less productive as a use of taxpayer money than designing and building a system, attempting to build a system that you know from the outset cannot and will not work. If there was suddenly a magic new technology, then we can revisit this decision. But the fundamental physics and the fundamental numerology of the attack versus defense balance in this has not changed in the last 30 years as we have examined this issue. So I think that just because it would be nice if we could magically drop a launch missile back on the enemy's head, if we do not have plausible technology that could accomplish that, doing paper designs of systems that will not work is a blatant waste of taxpayer money. Again, I urge all of my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on my amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Bill Foster
Bipartisan polling has shown that the CFPB is overwhelmingly popular among U.S. consumers, finding that 82 percent of voters, including 77 percent of Republicans, support the CFPB's mission.
I rise as a Ph.D. physicist in Congress, who spent most of his career in the national laboratories of the Department of Energy, to share the story of a research engineer at a national lab who was recently fired without cause by President…
I think the single-most useful thing that we in Congress could do is to establish a federally-recognized standard for presenting illegally-traceable identity.
If you conclude, as you are actively studying it, that you need more visibility into certain areas of, particularly nonbank things that may be parts of the chain of contagion, please let us know, because it is our job to avoid the next…





