Today we are considering H.R. 2225, the NSF for the Future Act; and H.R. 3593, the DOE Science for the Future Act. Both are tributes to the thoughtful bipartisanship of the leadership and the staff of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, on which I have the honor of serving. Last Congress, the Science Committee found itself in the remarkable position of discussing dueling bipartisan proposals to essentially double the science budgets, which, needless to say, represents a big change from years past. Out of that shared commitment to the future came the thoughtful and bipartisan NSF for the Future Act and the DOE Science for the Future Act. These bills, which represent significant and overdue increases to the budgets for the NSF and the DOE Office of Science, are crucial to ensuring that our Nation maintains its leadership in the science that will continue to change the world. H.R. 2225 was specifically written to ensure that the NSF will have the funds to accept a much larger fraction of the qualified research proposals that it receives every year, which is the single most important thing that we can do to ensure the health of the science it supports. {time} 1715 H.R. 3593 contains aggressive but feasible budget profiles for the existing programs of DOE's Office of Science.…
Share & report
More from Bill Foster
I would just like to simply reiterate that it should be the actions in the market that are the first indications that the regulators should have a look at, and when they see suspicious activity in the market, that is the time to get the…
I thank my colleagues for helping me bring this amendment to the floor. We now live in a world where technology has become increasingly important in our personal lives, in our economy, and in our democracy, but Congress is not adequately…
And rise today in support of H.R. 4279. This was a thoroughly negotiated bill, incorporating the views of affected funds and consumer and investor advocacy groups. My staff worked with Congressman Hollingsworth's staff up to the eleventh…
I thank the ranking member for yielding me time. I rise today in opposition to S.J. Res. 57, which provides for congressional disapproval of CFPB guidance on discrimination in the indirect auto lending industry. As the only Ph.D. scientist…





