The gentleman mentioned our ability to project power off aircraft carriers. I was reminded again, as we all were who watched CNN and read the front page of the newspapers, of American, I believe it was A-7 aircraft that were shot down by Syrian gunners. I believe they were using the same Russian-made surface-to-air missiles that are proliferated throughout the world. That was the pilot that, I believe, Jesse Jackson went over and rescued amid enormous publicity and self-promotion by Syria. The gentleman has made his point, but the point has really been validated every time we have had to send conventional aircraft into areas that maintain these surface-to-air missile sites. We have been shot down.
Andrew P. Hunter: “The gentleman mentioned our ability to project power off aircraft carriers. I was reminded again, as we all were who…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the risks faced by American aircraft in conflict zones during a debate.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.





