I hope the administration works with the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Saxton), who is chairman of the Subcommittee on Military Construction in the Committee on Armed Services to come up with some new ways to buy military housing for military families, because, as the gentleman knows, a lot of that housing is 20, 30, 40, 50 years old; and in a lot of places around the country our young families do not have housing available on the bases. There is not housing. They have to go out on the economy, and in places like San Diego you are looking at $1,000, $1,200 a month for the smallest amounts. So we have some major problems to fix, and that means money.
Andrew P. Hunter: “I hope the administration works with the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Saxton), who is chairman of the Subcommittee on…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for improved military housing for families during a discussion on military construction.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.





