Mr. Chairman, we have spoken about this amendment for some time now during this debate. I think most of the folks that are listening to the debate understand the problem. The problem is that there is an inextricable link between the satellite technology that we have been transferring to China pursuant to our satellite launch partnership with them and their nuclear missile capability. While we are trying to sort this problem out, Mr. Chairman, it makes sense for us to stop the train, to put on the brakes and say we are not going to make any transfers, no export or reexport of U.S. satellites, including commercial satellites and satellite components, to the People's Republic of China. That is what this amendment does. Mr. Chairman, in this crash we saw another problem that we had not thought about, and that is that we have these packages which, in theory, are protected against Chinese scientists and engineers being able to examine the contents even while they are in China.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to halt satellite technology transfers to China.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
But we are in a different situation now. And so we have an opportunity to come up with a strategy that is focused on meeting these new challenges, not simply trying to avoid more harm.
But let me register my objection to the Rules Committee's determination that one of the amendments that I had offered was not made in order, and that is the amendment that goes to the so-called tanker deal. Let me just explain to my…
I respect the gentleman who just made the statement who has been in Iraq. But my son was in Iraq, also, and on two missions, two tours, and Afghanistan. And one important fact that I think comes out when you talk to folks who have been…
It is my belief that, collectively, NATO is not yet at a maturity level sufficient to effectively incorporate cyber technologies that exploit critical Russian infrastructure.





