Mr. Chairman, this is a centerpiece of our strategic deterrent. The amount of money we are talking about here is less than 1 percent of the defense budget. With a growing nuclear club around the world, it is important for us to preserve the most important part of our nuclear deterrent. This amendment would gut that program and would hurt strategic stability. Please vote against this amendment offered by my friend, the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Luther).
Andrew P. Hunter: “Mr. Chairman, this is a centerpiece of our strategic deterrent. The amount of money we are talking about here is less…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment that would affect a key nuclear deterrent program during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
I think the key is deterrence, because I think the truth is, whether it is the scenario that we looked at, the scenarios war games there, there is no certainty of victory if the Russians make a serious move against the Baltics, at least in…





