What I would like to do and what others would like to do is change the position of the administration and not constrain theater missile defense. I think it is a very difficult thing to do right now when the threat is evolving rapidly, and I think also the multilateralization is a problem.
Discussing theater missile defense and the need to influence the administration's position.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
You cannot throw money at the problem, and we do not need to be investing government dollars where the private sector is going to invest its own dollars.
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
It is my belief that, collectively, NATO is not yet at a maturity level sufficient to effectively incorporate cyber technologies that exploit critical Russian infrastructure.
Other voices in this conversation
