Oversight or the primary review of the satellite transfers has now been taken away from the Department of Defense, who look at it from a national security standpoint, and given to the Department of Commerce, which arguably does not have the experts to understand exactly what is being transferred, and does not have probably the political will that the Department of Defense has to keep critical militarily strategic components from going to the hands of our potential adversaries. The Defense Department is tougher on these transfers.
Andrew P. Hunter: “Oversight or the primary review of the satellite transfers has now been taken away from the Department of Defense, who…”
On the recordMay 20, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the transfer of satellite oversight from the Department of Defense to the Department of Commerce.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Feb 28, 2017
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
May 18, 2022
I think competition works well when it is driving innovation, and obviously also can work well to control costs.
Feb 28, 2017
I think the key is deterrence, because I think the truth is, whether it is the scenario that we looked at, the scenarios war games there, there is no certainty of victory if the Russians make a serious move against the Baltics, at least in…





