I am kind of surprised at the gentleman's tirade here, because this gentleman never mentioned money, never mentioned treason, rarely mentioned the President. And when I went over the litany or the chronology of missile launches, I started with the Bush Administration in 1990. This is a Committee on National Security. We are not worried about where the money came from or what it did or whether there was influence. What we are concerned about, very simply, is this statement, this statement made by President Clinton's Department of Defense. Hopefully that is not part of a right wing conspiracy, I would say to my friend who just spoke. 'In May 1997 the administration was jolted by a classified Pentagon report concluding that scientists from Hughes and Loral Space and Communications had turned over expertise that 'significantly improved the reliability of China's nuclear missiles.' ' That is the New York Times, April 13, 1998. Our Department of Defense said American security has been damaged. That is what we are concerned about.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing national security concerns related to missile technology transfers during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Let me just say to my friend, I believe in disclosure. That is why I put every initiative on the Internet. I think you have got to disclose things and you have got to be able to be accountable for those things. I think that's absolutely…
But we are in a different situation now. And so we have an opportunity to come up with a strategy that is focused on meeting these new challenges, not simply trying to avoid more harm.
We have general officers, flag officers who go over to Iraq, Afghanistan just as they have gone to every war theater we've fought in. They talk to their colleagues. Their colleagues give them the facts as they see the facts. They come…





