when just a couple of days ago the Iranians tested an intermediate range ballistic missile, one that has the range to strike Israel, our administration was once more embarrassed, because they had predicted a number of times that the Iranians could not achieve this capability until sometime late next year. Well, the Iranians were a year ahead of schedule. Only one person predicted they would be able to do it much earlier in this body, and that was the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Weldon). He is working on a piece of missile defense legislation. The gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Saxton) is putting in legislation a number of us are cosponsoring which directs the President to conduct an emergency program to build a defense against the systems the Iranians are developing right now. Mr. Speaker, now is the time for the President to act. With the same urgency with which our enemies are building the ballistic missiles, we must act with the same urgency to build defenses against those missiles.
On the recordJuly 24, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing Iranian missile tests and the need for missile defense legislation.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Feb 28, 2017
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
Feb 11, 2015
I think it is reflective of another issue in federal contracting, which is access to capital.
May 22, 2008
My friends, this is the age of missiles. The people that we listen to so carefully in our hearings are the combatant commanders. Those are the guys who are in charge of running military operations in the case of an attack on the United…





