Let me finish my statement, if I might. We commend the President as Commander in Chief. That is something we did in 1991. Under the Constitution, he leads this military force. We commend the Members of the United States Armed Forces. We commend the families. We give them our sincere gratitude and appreciation. I would think that any Member reading this resolution, and I would ask all Members to read it since the gentleman has called it into question, would agree that this resolution is an excellent resolution, and that it does all the things that we want to do. It would lead us all to wonder why the gentleman somehow wants it to say something else or follow some other example. It does not make a lot of sense.
Andrew P. Hunter: “Let me finish my statement, if I might. We commend the President as Commander in Chief. That is something we did in…”
On the recordMarch 20, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing a resolution commending the President and the Armed Forces.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Jan 14, 2020
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.
Feb 28, 2017
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
Feb 28, 2017
I think the key is deterrence, because I think the truth is, whether it is the scenario that we looked at, the scenarios war games there, there is no certainty of victory if the Russians make a serious move against the Baltics, at least in…





