the Members of the House have already voted against the substance of this amendment. We voted almost 3-1 to add $4 billion to the emergency supplemental appropriations bill. That money was in response to a request by the services when we asked them this year, what do they have in unfunded requirements that is not in the President's budget? They gave us a list of $16 billion, including ammunition, spare parts, training, and, in some cases, replacement platforms, aircraft, and other things to fill in areas where the President had not funded the armed services. In response, we gave $4 billion on the emergency supplemental. We did not get that. The other body would not go along with that. But they did go along with an increase of our top line of $4 billion. This amendment would, basically, gut that and wipe out the will of the House that voted almost 3-1 to give more money to the military. Now, why did they do it? They did it because defense spending has been in decline for 13 years. We are spending approximately $100 billion less this year on national security than we did in 1985 in real dollars. Now, some people may say, well, we funded readiness accounts. We funded personnel accounts. Why can we not take money out the modernization accounts. I think the best reason is the 80 aircraft that have crashed in the last year and a half. For any Member that wants to know the essence of this debate, it is this list of crashes.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military funding and the implications of an amendment during House debate.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
It is my belief that, collectively, NATO is not yet at a maturity level sufficient to effectively incorporate cyber technologies that exploit critical Russian infrastructure.
We have general officers, flag officers who go over to Iraq, Afghanistan just as they have gone to every war theater we've fought in. They talk to their colleagues. Their colleagues give them the facts as they see the facts. They come…
Let me take back my time and explain to the gentleman why it's important to have report language. You start programs and you also put policies in place. If you put those in the bill and those are locked into law and then you get a call…
I rise today because in this last week and next week, we are going to be considering in this Congress spending more than we've ever spent since World War II. With the Troubled Assets Relief Program, otherwise known as TARP, and I like to…





