Just to conclude, Mr. Chairman, this is a three-sentence amendment. When it takes a colloquy to explain what a three-sentence amendment means, we know we are in trouble. This amendment, as it is written, would freeze our present programs with respect to testing missile defense. Please vote ``no'' on this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to missile defense testing during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
we are in the middle of a war in which the battlefield situation changes on a daily basis. The idea that the gentleman has given us a requirement for the administration to project until 2068, for 50, 60 years as to what is going to happen…
Let me ask my friend, Dan Burton, a lot of people have criticized Phil Mickelson because he is kind of a go-for-broke player. And they often say, as in some of the shots that he took in some of the closing holes in some of the majors, that…
You cannot throw money at the problem, and we do not need to be investing government dollars where the private sector is going to invest its own dollars.
I remember, I think it was 1987 when members of this committee, the Armed Services Committee, sent a letter to the leadership of Israel, and we said this--and I know this because I drafted that letter. We said, at some point in the…





