Just to conclude, Mr. Chairman, this is a three-sentence amendment. When it takes a colloquy to explain what a three-sentence amendment means, we know we are in trouble. This amendment, as it is written, would freeze our present programs with respect to testing missile defense. Please vote ``no'' on this amendment.
Opposing an amendment related to missile defense testing during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.
I think competition works well when it is driving innovation, and obviously also can work well to control costs.
Other voices in this conversation
