I just wanted to go through a few more of the deadly mistakes that the Menendez substitute does in contravention of what the Commission said. They take away from the military, military communications. They take away intelligence information on an adversary's communication. They take away defense cryptology. They take away warnings of impending military action against U.S. interests. They take away joint operational planning and execution. All because they ignored those particular teams that are hosted by the National Signals Agency. That was crayon legislation.
Andrew P. Hunter: “I just wanted to go through a few more of the deadly mistakes that the Menendez substitute does in contravention of what…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the Menendez substitute during a debate on military and intelligence issues.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.
You cannot throw money at the problem, and we do not need to be investing government dollars where the private sector is going to invest its own dollars.
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.





